# ADR-0004 · GitOps as source of truth **Status**: accepted **Date**: 2026-05 ## Context Configuration of a Blocao site involves: OpenWrt UCI files, Frigate config, MQTT bridge policy, firewall rules, container compose files, retention policy, custom DNS lists. This needs to be: - Auditable (who changed what, when, why). - Reproducible (a new router should reach the same state as an existing one). - Transactional (changes apply together or not at all). - Reversible (rollback to last known good). LuCI's web-based config edits and ad-hoc SSH changes don't satisfy any of those. Configuration management tools (Ansible, Puppet) work but introduce a layer of indirection between intent and state. ## Decision **Two repositories per site**: `site-config` (per-site overrides) and `fleet-config` (organization-wide common config). Configuration changes happen exclusively as commits to these repos. The router clones both, reconciles every 5 minutes: 1. `git fetch` both repos. 2. Detect drift (SHA256 of live files vs applied config). 3. Apply layered: `fleet-config` first, `site-config` overrides. 4. If a change fails to apply, rollback to last known good and alert. **Drift detection**: anything edited live (e.g. `vi /etc/config/firewall` outside the repo) is flagged in the UI as `DRIFTED` until either committed back to the repo or reverted. The **GitOps panel** in the console exposes Applied/HEAD/Remote SHAs and lets the operator trigger fetch/reconcile/rollback. For deeper changes, the operator pushes commits via Gitea/GitHub UI or git CLI. ## Consequences **Good**: - Anyone with read access to the repo can audit "what's running here". - Rolling back a regression is a `git revert + reconcile`. - Same operator experience scales from 1 site to 1000 sites. - The fleet-config repo enables "edit once, apply to all" for org-wide policy changes. **Bad / trade-offs**: - Steeper learning curve for ops who don't know git. Mitigated by the GitOps panel handling common operations. - 5-minute reconcile lag means urgent changes feel slow. Mitigated by the **manual reconcile button**. - Secrets in repos are a problem — addressed by encrypting them with `sops` and decrypting at apply time. ## Alternatives considered - **Ansible push**: requires central control node, secrets management, doesn't give the audit trail in the same place as the code. - **Salt or Puppet**: heavier than needed for our scale. - **Direct UCI edits via API**: works for one-off changes but produces no history and no rollback.